Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Book Review on Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
It is 27 years since Denzil Lush first produced this book, some subsequent editions of which one has had the pleasure of reviewing for Family Law, and which, for some reason, does not figure as much...
Re AC (A Child) [2020] EWFC 90
(Family Court, Peel J, 11 December 2020)Private Law Children – s 8, Children Act 1989 – Inheritance - Jurisdiction Whether court had jurisdiction to authorise the mother to accept the...
Second reading in the House of Lords of the Domestic Abuse Bill
The Domestic Abuse Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords on 5 January 2021. The committee stage, where the bill will be scrutinised line-by-line, does not yet have a confirmed date....
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
How the care system should change - a child’s perspective
The Children’s Commissioner has published a new investigation into how children affected by the care system would like the current system to change ahead of the government’s planned...
View all articles

Nigel Dyer QC's take on divorce in the Supreme Court

Dec 7, 2018, 10:37 AM
Slug : divorce-in-the-supreme-court-discussed
Meta Title : divorce
Meta Keywords : Supreme Court divorce
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 11, 2019, 07:13 AM
Article ID : 117545

Durham Law School recently hosted leading family law silk Nigel Dyer QC - from 1 Hare Court - who offered his reflections on this significant case of Owens v Owens.

In July 2018 the U.K. Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in Owens v Owens [2018] UKSC 41. Attracting extensive media coverage, the judgment saw the Justices unanimously refuse to grant a divorce to Mrs Owens who petitioned on the basis that her husband’s behaviour was such that she could not reasonably be expected to live with him.

Nigel represented the husband in Owens and, drawing upon his extensive expertise in this area, situated his analysis of that case within the broader landscape of divorce reform. 

Noting that Owens represents a catalyst for reform, Nigel analysed the complexities of rare defended petitions and the often-misunderstood application of the ‘unreasonable behaviour’ fact. He also questioned why Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guaranteeing the right to respect to private and family life, was under-explored.

Nigel’s presentation was followed by an informative talk by fellow 1 Hare Court barrister, Joshua Viney, who provided advice on securing pupillage and building a successful practice at the family Bar. His reflections on practising family law were incredibly useful for students currently considering that career path.

This was a lively and engaging event on a topical family law issue. Both speakers demystified the process of divorce and offered the audience a unique insight into a key Supreme Court decision. The event was coordinated by Dr Andy Hayward, module convenor for the Law of Family Relationships course at Durham Law School.

Dr Andy Hayward - Assistant Professor in Family Law, Durham Law School

Categories :
  • Articles
  • News
Tags :
  • Divorce
Provider : LexisNexis
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Load more comments
Comment by from