Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
Meta Title :Omnibuses of Non-Molestation and Occupation Orders
Meta Keywords :family law, reforms, draft orders, non-molestation omnibus, occupation orders omnibus, Practice Guidance: Family Court – Duration of Ex Parte (Without Notice) Orders, Mostyn
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Oct 14, 2014, 04:02 AM
Article ID :107393
Yesterday, the President of the Family Division Sir James
Munby released Practice Guidance relating to the duration of ex parte (without
notice) orders: Practice Guidance: Family
Court – Duration of Ex Parte (Without Notice) Orders.
The guidance confirms that there must be a fixed end date to
such orders and that the practice of granting any ex parte injunctive order in
the Family Court or in the Family Division for an unlimited time must
stop. The Practice Guidance can be found
The guidance examines the relevant case-law and sets out
certain principles that must be complied with.
An ex parte (without notice) injunctive order
must never be made without limit of time and there must be a fixed end date.
The order must not merely specify a return day
but must say in clear terms precisely when it expires.
duration of the order should not normally exceed 14 days.
order must also specify the date, time and place of the hearing on the return
day. It is usually convenient for this date to coincide with the expiry date of
The order must contain a statement of the right
to make an application to set aside or vary the order under FPR 2010 rule
the respondent does apply to set aside or vary the order the court must list it
as a matter of urgency.
To ensure compliance with the above principles the Practice
Guidance suggests an appropriate form of order to be used.