Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill requires amendment to reconcile ‘wide-ranging and interlocking' concerns

Sep 29, 2018, 21:39 PM
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution, interim report,
The European Union (Withdrawal) Bill is drafted in such a way that it makes parliamentary scrutiny very difficult and will therefore require amendment, the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution has concluded.
Slug : european-union-withdrawal-bill-requires-amendment-to-reconcile-wide-ranging-and-interlocking-concerns
Meta Title : European Union (Withdrawal) Bill requires amendment to reconcile ‘wide-ranging and interlocking' concerns
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Sep 8, 2017, 02:51 AM
Article ID : 115971

The European Union (Withdrawal) Bill is drafted in such a way that it makes parliamentary scrutiny very difficult and will therefore require amendment, the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution has  concluded. In an interim report on the Bill, the Select Committee highlights a number of ‘wide-ranging and interlocking constitutional concerns’, including for the rule of law and the existing devolution settlement and recommends in addition to amendment that powers granted to Ministers under the Bill be used only to make necessary technical changes rather than policy decisions.

The House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution has issued a report on the Bill ahead of its second reading in the House of Commons, the ‘political, legal and constitutional significance’ of which it says is unparalleled.

Lack of parliamentary scrutiny raises ‘wide-ranging and interlocking constitutional concerns’

The report concludes that the executive powers contained in the Bill are unprecedented and raise ‘wide-ranging and interlocking constitutional concerns’, particularly around the separation of powers between Parliament and the government.

As such the report makes a number of recommendations for amending the Bill:

  • ensure legal certainty – the Bill has fundamental implications from a Rule of Law perspective and should be reconstructed in a way that is clear so that individuals and organisations know exactly what the law is post-Brexit;

  • refrain from using the Bill to implement policy decisions – powers granted to Ministers by the Bill should only be used to implement technical change, not policy decisions; and

  • delegated powers should be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny – Parliamentary procedures must ensure delegated legislation which contains significant policy decisions is subject to scrutiny.

Bill has ‘profound consequences’ for devolution

In the interim report, the Committee points out that while the legislative consent of the devolved institutions may not be legally required, carrying on with the Bill without it would be potentially damaging and has ‘profound consequences’ for the devolution settlement.

The Committee will review the constitutional implications of the Bill for the devolution settlement as a whole in a forthcoming inquiry.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Brexit
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from