The Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (FJO) has published an updated briefing examining how artificial intelligence could be used within the family justice system, highlighting potential benefits for both families and professionals while warning of the need for careful governance.
The revised paper, which updates a first edition published in 2024, is intended to stimulate discussion about the role emerging technologies could play in improving the operation of family justice processes. It considers how AI tools might support administrative functions, assist professional decision-making and improve the experience of families involved in legal proceedings.
According to the Nuffield FJO, advances in artificial intelligence are increasingly shaping the legal sector, with commercial law firms already using automated tools to carry out tasks such as contract analysis, routine administrative work and legal research. The briefing explores whether similar technologies, including generative AI systems, could be used safely and fairly within family law proceedings.
The report identifies three broad areas in which AI could potentially support the family justice system. These include improving families’ experiences when navigating complex court processes, enabling administrative efficiencies within courts and related services, and assisting professionals when analysing information relevant to case management or decision-making.
However, the Nuffield FJO also emphasises that the adoption of such technology raises significant challenges and risks. The briefing highlights concerns relating to algorithmic bias, the protection of sensitive personal data, transparency in automated decision-making and the overall accuracy and reliability of AI-generated outputs.
The paper therefore outlines the importance of a robust governance framework to ensure that any use of AI within the family justice system is safe, ethical and accountable. It notes that discussions about the reach and scope of artificial intelligence are becoming increasingly common across public services, but questions remain about how prepared justice systems are to manage both the opportunities and risks.
By setting out examples of current and potential uses, as well as the associated safeguards that may be required, the Nuffield FJO said the briefing aims to encourage informed debate among policymakers, practitioners and researchers about how technology could shape the future of family justice.
