Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Y v H and Another [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:21 PM
Jurisdiction – Private law proceedings – Removal to Northern Ireland – Forum conveniens – Whether there were live proceedings before the English court
The court found that England was the more suitable forum and declined to stay the proceedings.
Slug : y-v-h-and-another-2017-ewhc-3698-fam
Meta Title : Y v H and Another [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Jurisdiction – Private law proceedings – Removal to Northern Ireland – Forum conveniens – Whether there were live proceedings before the English court
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 11, 2018, 05:15 AM
Article ID : 116462

(Family Division, Baker J, 22 December 2017)

Jurisdiction – Private law proceedings – Removal to Northern Ireland – Forum conveniens – Whether there were live proceedings before the English court

The court found that England was the more suitable forum and declined to stay the proceedings.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

IMPORTANT NOTICE
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment no person other than the advocates or the solicitors instructing them and other persons named in this version of the judgment may be identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the child and members of his family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: FD15P00276
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION


Courtroom No. 45


The Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL




Friday, 22nd December 2017


Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER


IN THE MATTER OF THE FAMILY LAW ACT 1986
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF C (A CHILD) (JURISDICTION)
B E T W E E N:

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Y
Applicant

and

 H (1)
 C (2)
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Transcript from a recording by Ubiqus
291-299 Borough High Street, London SE1 1JG
Tel: 020 7269 0370
legal@ubiqus.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

ADELE CAMERON-DOUGLAS (instructed by Accessslaw) appeared on behalf of the Applicant
HUGH MERRY appeared by direct access on behalf of the First Respondent
ANTHONY HAND (instructed by Abels Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Second Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

Judgment: Y v H and Another [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Jurisdiction
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from