Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
View all articles
Authors

Y v H and Another [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:21 PM
Jurisdiction – Private law proceedings – Removal to Northern Ireland – Forum conveniens – Whether there were live proceedings before the English court
The court found that England was the more suitable forum and declined to stay the proceedings.
Slug : y-v-h-and-another-2017-ewhc-3698-fam
Meta Title : Y v H and Another [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Jurisdiction – Private law proceedings – Removal to Northern Ireland – Forum conveniens – Whether there were live proceedings before the English court
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 11, 2018, 05:15 AM
Article ID : 116462

(Family Division, Baker J, 22 December 2017)

Jurisdiction – Private law proceedings – Removal to Northern Ireland – Forum conveniens – Whether there were live proceedings before the English court

The court found that England was the more suitable forum and declined to stay the proceedings.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

IMPORTANT NOTICE
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment no person other than the advocates or the solicitors instructing them and other persons named in this version of the judgment may be identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the child and members of his family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Case No: FD15P00276
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION


Courtroom No. 45


The Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL




Friday, 22nd December 2017


Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER


IN THE MATTER OF THE FAMILY LAW ACT 1986
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF C (A CHILD) (JURISDICTION)
B E T W E E N:

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Y
Applicant

and

 H (1)
 C (2)
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Transcript from a recording by Ubiqus
291-299 Borough High Street, London SE1 1JG
Tel: 020 7269 0370
legal@ubiqus.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

ADELE CAMERON-DOUGLAS (instructed by Accessslaw) appeared on behalf of the Applicant
HUGH MERRY appeared by direct access on behalf of the First Respondent
ANTHONY HAND (instructed by Abels Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Second Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

Judgment: Y v H and Another [2017] EWHC 3698 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Jurisdiction
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from