Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

WELFARE: R(Chatting) v (1) Viridian Housing, (2) London Borough of Wandsworth [2012] EWHC 3595 (Admin), [2013] COPLR 108

Sep 29, 2018, 21:03 PM
Slug : welfare-r-chatting-v-1-viridian-housing-2-london-borough-of-wandsworth-2012-ewhc-3595-admin-2013-coplr-108
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 9, 2013, 04:16 AM
Article ID : 102073

(Queen's Bench Division, Nicholas Paines QC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge, 13 December 2012)

The elderly woman lived in a residential care home due to a number of physical and mental impediments which also meant that she lacked capacity to make decisions about her residence and care. The charity which owned the premises she lived in reorganised the arrangements for the provision of care. The woman, by her niece, acting as her litigation friend, brought a claim for judicial review against the charity, seeking a declaration that in transferring responsibility for her care to another organisation the charity were in breach of a compromise arrangement made in earlier litigation and acting in breach of the woman's rights under Art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

The judge dismissed the application for judicial review. On the facts, the transfer of the woman's care had not been in breach of the compromise agreement or in breach of the woman's European Convention rights.

There was no basis for saying that the local authority was under a legal duty, enforceable by way of judicial review, to make arrangements under s 26 of the National Assistance Act 1948 for the woman to receive accommodation and care in a particular residential unit.

 

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from