Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Vulnerable Witnesses and Children Working Group final report – evidence in Family Courts

Sep 29, 2018, 21:45 PM
family law, vulnerable witnesses, Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group, voice of the child
The Working Group (headed by Hayden J and Russell J) was set up by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division last year to review the guidelines for judges meeting children subject to family proceedings and guidance on them giving evidence.
Slug : vulnerable-witnesses-and-children-working-group-final-report-evidence-in-family-courts
Meta Title : Vulnerable Witnesses and Children Working Group final report – evidence in Family Courts
Meta Keywords : family law, vulnerable witnesses, Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group, voice of the child
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 18, 2015, 03:00 AM
Article ID : 108807
The final report and recommendations of the Vulnerable Witnesses and Children Working Group has been published.

The Working Group (headed by Hayden J and Russell J) was set up by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division last year to review the guidelines for judges meeting children subject to family proceedings and guidance on them giving evidence.

The report also looks at the wider issue of vulnerable people giving evidence in family proceedings and compares it to the current practice in criminal cases.

The aims of the Working Group were set out in the 12th View from the President's Chamber: The process of reform: next steps published on 4th June 2014:

'First, it is time to review the Family Justice Council’s April 2010 Guidelines for Judges Meeting Children who are Subject to Family Proceedings [2010] 2 FLR 1872, particularly in the light of the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Re KP [2014] EWCA Civ 554, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming).

Secondly, it is time to review the Family Justice Council’s Working Party’s December 2011Guidelines on Children Giving Evidence in Family Proceedings [2012] Fam Law 79. Those Guidelineswere prepared following the decision of the Supreme Court in Re W (Children) (Abuse: Oral Evidence) [2010] UKSC 12, [2010] 1 FLR 1485. Since then we have had the decision of the Supreme Court in Re LC (Reunite: International Child Abduction Centre Intervening) [2014] UKSC 1, [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming and reported in April [2014] Fam Law 408).

Thirdly, there is a pressing need for us to address the wider issue of vulnerable people giving evidence in family proceedings, something in which the family justice system lags woefully behind the criminal justice system. This includes the inadequacy of our procedures for taking evidence from alleged victims, a matter to which Roderic Wood J drew attention as long ago as 2006: H v L and R [2006] EWHC 3099 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 162. As HHJ Wildblood QC observed in Re B (A Child) (Private law fact finding – unrepresented father), D v K [2014] EWHC 700 (Fam), para 6(ii), processes which we still tolerate in the Family Court are prohibited by statute in the Crown Court. We must be cautious before we rush forward to reinvent the wheel. A vast amount of thought has gone into crafting the arrangements now in place in the criminal courts: see for example, in addition to the
The Working Party will need to build on the experiences of judges in the Family Division and the Family Court who have had to deal with these issues, particularly in the more recent past. But it is also vital that the Working Party taps into and incorporates in its thinking both the highly relevant and thought-provoking views of the Family Justice Young People’s Board and the inter-disciplinary expertise of the Family Justice Council.'
The conclusions and recommendations are from paragraph 35 onwards.

Vulnerable Witnesses and Children Working Group final report – evidence in Family Courts is available to download here.

Further downloads:

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
happy_children
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from