Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

Treatment or Therapy? The House of Lords decision in Re G (Interim Care Order: Residential Assessment)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
The article recites some of the facts and summarises the House of Lords' conclusions
Slug : treatment-or-therapy-the-house-of-lords-decision-in-re-g-interim-care-order-residential-assessment
Meta Title : Treatment or Therapy? The House of Lords decision in Re G (Interim Care Order: Residential Assessment)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 8, 2006, 08:47 AM
Article ID : 88153

Jonathan Cohen QC and Charles Hale Barristers, 4 Paper Buildings, Temple (counsel for the respondents to the appeal) By now all public law practitioners will be aware of the decision of the House of Lords in Re G (Interim care Order: Residential Assessment) [2005] UKHL 68, [2006] FLR (forthcoming). This article seeks to consider some of the consequences of their Lordships decision. Broadly speaking, the result was the reaffirmation of the line of decisions which drew a distinction between treatment and assessment for the purposes of determining whether an assessment fell within the provisions of s 38(6) of the Children Act 1989. The article recites some of the facts and summarises the House of Lords' conclusions. See April [2006] Fam Law 294 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from