Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Trapped in the million pound pad: self-determination, children's rights and relying on a child maintenance cheat

Sep 29, 2018, 21:35 PM
Family Law, divorce, Child Maintenance Service
Title : Trapped in the million pound pad: self-determination, children's rights and relying on a child maintenance cheat
Slug : trapped-in-the-million-pound-pad-self-determination-children-s-rights-and-relying-on-a-child-maintenance-cheat
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Aug 23, 2017, 03:11 AM
Article ID : 115586

Emma Gill
Vardags


The parliamentary review into the operation of the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) has highlighted some chilling facts. Children of wealthy parents are being left destitute. Rich parents, able to manipulate their income so as to exploit the rigid CMS formula means that assessments are being made at zero. These are children whose parents have fortunes rooted abroad, live from capital or have income which is does not appear on a UK tax return. A sophisticated income structure simply foxes the CMS system, resulting in a nil assessment.

The issue is compounded for those who depend on the other parent for housing. A court can only look at increasing maintenance once the CMS threshold is reached which mean the courts have the impossible task of making financial provision for a child, including housing, where the child's interest is the paramount consideration yet they cannot determine income unless the CMS threshold is reached.

The CMS also has only limited avenues for reassessment, the most important of which is 'lifestyle'. This means that the paying parent can enjoy super cars, yachts and the associated trappings of a superior income, but the CMS cannot consider this. Thankfully, the select committee has determined that this ground for appeal needs to be reinstated but this simply does not go far enough.


The full version of this article will appear in the September 2017 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
money_house
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from