Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Transparency Result

Sep 29, 2018, 17:14 PM
Title : Transparency Result
Slug : transparency-result
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 26, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87563

On 22 March 2007 the Government published the responses to its consultation paper Confidence and confidentiality: Improving transparency and privacy in family courts (CP 11/06) which set out the Government's proposals for improving transparency and privacy in the family courts. One of the proposals which provoked most debate during the consultation was that of the media attending courts as proxy for the public, a topic which arises throughout the report. An area which received wide support was increasing the amount of information available on how the family justice system works. Also popular was making that and other information available to those involved in proceedings. There was particularly strong support for the proposal on later life information, that is, retaining information for adults about the family proceedings in which they had been involved as children. Children, young people and adults agreed that later life information should be available and that it could take a variety of forms, such as a transcript or summary of the judgment.

Over 200 children and young people took part in the consultation process. In addition to the main response paper, their views were also published in the Young people's guide to the confidence and confidentiality response paper, which was produced with the help of the Office of the Children's Rights Director. For further information on both the response paper and the young people's guide see www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courttransparencey1106/cp1106.htm and May [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from