Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The Legal Rights and Wrongs of Puberty Blocking in England
Hannah Hirst, PhD student, University of Liverpool, School of Law and Social JusticeKeywords: Puberty blockers – children’s rights – access to health – UNCRC –...
Re M (Special Guardianship Order: Leave To Apply To Discharge) [2021] EWCA Civ 442
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Peter Jackson, Baker, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 26 March 2021)Public Law Children – Special guardianship – Leave to apply to discharge SGO – Refusal...
AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam)
(Family Division, Lieven J, 26 March 2021)Medical treatment - Gender Dysphoria – Consent – Young person prescribed puberty blockers – Decision in Bell – Whether parents could...
Re H-N And Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) [2021] EWCA Civ 448
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), President, King, Holroyde LJJ, 30 March 2021)Private law children - Domestic Abuse – Fact finding – ApproachThe Court of Appeal provided guidance in four...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
View all articles
Authors

(Trans) Marriage Equality? Challenging Europe’s Marital ‘Dissolution Requirements’

Sep 29, 2018, 18:35 PM
Transgender – Gender Recognition – Divorce – Human Rights –Proportionality – Marriage Law
Across the Council of Europe, 23 jurisdictions require that transgender individuals dissolve their marriage before obtaining legal gender recognition, on the basis that the marriage would otherwise be converted into a same-gender one.
Slug : trans-marriage-equality-challenging-europe-s-marital-dissolution-requirements
Meta Title : (Trans) Marriage Equality? Challenging Europe’s Marital ‘Dissolution Requirements’
Meta Keywords : Transgender – Gender Recognition – Divorce – Human Rights –Proportionality – Marriage Law
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 6, 2016, 03:33 AM
Article ID : 112997
Peter Dunne

Keywords: Transgender – Gender Recognition – Divorce – Human Rights –Proportionality – Marriage Law 

Across the Council of Europe, 23 jurisdictions require that transgender individuals dissolve their marriage before obtaining legal gender recognition, on the basis that the marriage would otherwise be converted into a same-gender one. While European countries are increasingly willing to acknowledge preferred gender, there is concern that gender recognition should not become a Trojan horse for ‘marriage equality’. This article challenges the assumption that dissolution requirements can only be overcome through extending greater freedom to marry (as is currently evident in jurisdictions such as Northern Ireland). Within a European human rights framework, where domestic and supra-national actors have consistently rejected a right to ‘gay marriage’, tying trans marital protections to same-gender couples is an insufficient strategy both in its scope and impact. Instead, this article presents a two-pronged human rights critique of dissolution requirements which does not rely upon the introduction of ‘marriage equality’. First, according to Europe’s common law and civil law traditions, the validity and status of marriage is determined at the ‘point of entry’. Where a heterosexual couple contracts a valid marriage, their union remains, as a matter of law, opposite-gender even where one spouse obtains legal gender recognition. Second, even if gender recognition does convert a trans marriage into a same-gender union, additional considerations – the small number of couples, the existence of de facto homosexual marriages and the effect of divorce on trans families – suggest that dissolution requirements are a disproportionate interference with private and family life as enshrined in Art 8 ECHR. 
This article has been accepted for publication in Child and Family Law Quarterly in Issue 4, Vol 28, Year 2016. The final published version of this article will be published and made publicly available here 24 months after its publication date, under a CC-BY-NC licence.
Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Family_law_cflq
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from