Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

The welfare assessment in radicalisation cases under the Children Act 1989: to what extent do race and gender influence judicial intervention in the family home?

May 27, 2020, 12:56 PM
Using race and gender as a critical lens, this article addresses two queries: first, how consistently do family courts interpret the ‘paramountcy’ principle of child welfare in cases concerning female minors under suspicion of extremist activity?
Slug :
Meta Title : The welfare assessment in radicalisation cases under the Children Act 1989: to what extent do race and gender influence judicial intervention in the family home?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 26, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Srishti Suresh, Coram Chambers

Using race and gender as a critical lens, this article addresses two queries: first, how consistently do family courts interpret the ‘paramountcy’ principle of child welfare in cases concerning female minors under suspicion of extremist activity? Second, to what extent is the construction of welfare affected by competing counter-terrorism considerations? 

The ‘paramountcy’ of child welfare is the cornerstone of judicial reasoning in family law. Yet as radicalisation cases fall into a new ‘stop-gap’ between national security and the family home, the interpretation of welfare may significantly change shape. Judges have discretion to holistically assess the impact of race, gender and culture on the wellbeing of a child. Accordingly, the nature of this article is critical and interdisciplinary, relying on sociological understandings of race and gender, as well as how these translate conceptually into the law. 

As this paper is an amended version of my masters dissertation, it has been published in three parts. The first constructs a methodological lens, assessing the use of race and gender as criteria for analysis. The second and third apply this lens to a critical discussion of extant case law; ultimately taking a broad view as to the effective assessment of intersectional identities by family courts.



The full article will be published in Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from