Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

The High Court of Australia to consider the definition of “parent”

Mar 5, 2019, 03:43 AM
The High Court of Australia to consider the definition of “parent”
Slug :
Meta Title : The High Court of Australia to consider the definition of “parent”
Meta Keywords : The High Court of Australia to consider the definition of “parent”
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Mar 5, 2019, 03:00 AM
Article ID :

Family lawyers have another reason to keep a watchful eye on the High Court of Australia in 2019, writes Will Stidston, a special counsel and accredited family law specialist at Barry Nilsson in Melbourne.

The High Court of Australia recently granted special leave to hear an appeal from the decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Parsons and Anor & Masson [2018] FamCAFC 115. In summary:

  1. A child was conceived utilising artificial insemination and the father was named on the child’s birth certificate.
  2. A controversy arose between the parents as to the parentage of the child.
  3. At first instance, the Family Court of Australia held that the father was a “parent” for the purposes of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The mother appealed this decision.
  4. The Full Court of the Family Court of Australia allowed the appeal and determined that the father was not a parent on the basis of s 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) and s 14(2) of the Status of Children Act 1996 (NSW). The father sought, and was granted, special leave to appeal this decision to the High Court of Australia as indicated above.

The High Court appeal, which will utilise the pseudonym Masson v Parsons & Ors will consider, inter alia, whether the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia erred in concluding that:

  1. s 142(s) of the Status of Children Act 1996 (NSW) operated to determine that the appellant was not a “parent” for the purposes of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth); and
  2. s 60H of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) exhaustively defines parents of children for the purpose of that Act.

The decision of the High Court will no doubt be illuminating with broad application for parents utilising artificial insemination procedures.


Categories :
  • Articles
  • News
Tags :
  • family law
Australia-Flag-2
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Load more comments
Comment by from