Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

SZ v DG and others [2020] EWHC 881 (Fam)

Apr 30, 2020, 12:03 PM
Public law children – Contact order – Father applied for leave to apply for contact order
The Family Division dismissed the father's application for an order for contact in respect of his son.
Slug :
Meta Title : SZ v DG and others [2020] EWHC 881 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Contact order – Father applied for leave to apply for contact order
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 29, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 14 April 2020)

Public law children – Contact order – Father applied for leave to apply for contact order

The Family Division dismissed the father's application for an order for contact in respect of his son.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 881 (Fam)

Case No: FD20P00031

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 14/04/2020

Before:

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

SZ
Applicant

- and –

DG and PG
First & Second Respondents

- and –

LG

Third Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Miriam Best (instructed by Crosse & Crosse Solicitors LLP) for the applicant
Christopher Watson (instructed by Nottingham City Council) for the Council
The respondents were not present or represented

Hearing date: 1 April 2020

The hearing was conducted remotely of by and through Zoom

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment: SZ v DG [2020] EWHC 881 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from