Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles

Supreme Court rejects terminally ill man's challenge over assisted dying

Dec 7, 2018, 10:37 AM
Slug : supreme-court-rejects-terminally-ill-man-s-challenge-over-assisted-dying
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 27, 2018, 08:23 AM
Article ID : 117542

The U.K.'s highest court has refused a terminally-ill motor neurone disease patient to challenge current legislation on assisted dying.

Supreme Court justices rejected a bid by Noel Conway to appeal against an earlier ruling in his fight over laws that prevent him from being helped to die.

The 68-year-old, from Shrewsbury, says that being forced to choose between "unacceptable options" to end his life is "barbaric."

Conway, who wants medical assistance to die when he has less than six months left to live, has the mental capacity to make the decision and has made a "voluntary, clear, settled and informed" choice, he argued.

However, in a three-page decision issued today, Supreme Court judges turned down Conway's request, a retired lecturer who is paralysed from the neck down.

The three supreme court justices – Lady Hale, the Supreme Court president, Lord Reed, the deputy president, and Lord Kerr – acknowledged that the issue was of “transcendent public importance."

Read the full Supreme Court decision HERE
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider : LexisNexis
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from