Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Supreme Court rejects terminally ill man's challenge over assisted dying

Dec 7, 2018, 10:37 AM
Title : Supreme Court rejects terminally ill man's challenge over assisted dying
Slug : supreme-court-rejects-terminally-ill-man-s-challenge-over-assisted-dying
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Nov 27, 2018, 08:23 AM
Article ID : 117542

The U.K.'s highest court has refused a terminally-ill motor neurone disease patient to challenge current legislation on assisted dying.

Supreme Court justices rejected a bid by Noel Conway to appeal against an earlier ruling in his fight over laws that prevent him from being helped to die.

The 68-year-old, from Shrewsbury, says that being forced to choose between "unacceptable options" to end his life is "barbaric."

Conway, who wants medical assistance to die when he has less than six months left to live, has the mental capacity to make the decision and has made a "voluntary, clear, settled and informed" choice, he argued.

However, in a three-page decision issued today, Supreme Court judges turned down Conway's request, a retired lecturer who is paralysed from the neck down.

The three supreme court justices – Lady Hale, the Supreme Court president, Lord Reed, the deputy president, and Lord Kerr – acknowledged that the issue was of “transcendent public importance."


Read the full Supreme Court decision HERE
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Supreme_Court
Provider : LexisNexis
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from