Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

State funding for family proceedings after Q v Q (Private Law: Public Funding): Part 1 (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:56 PM
family law, public funding, legal aid, LASPO, litigants in person, access to justice, exceptional funding
In ​Q v Q; Re B; Re C (Private Law: Public Funding) [2014] EWFC 31, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at [2014] Fam Law 1398) Sir James Munby P said that funding should be ‘provided by’ by HMCTS for children proceedings in particular circumstances.
Slug : state-funding-for-family-proceedings-after-q-v-q-private-law-public-funding-part-1
Meta Title : State funding for family proceedings after Q v Q (Private Law: Public Funding): Part 1 (£)
Meta Keywords : family law, public funding, legal aid, LASPO, litigants in person, access to justice, exceptional funding
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 26, 2014, 04:55 AM
Article ID : 107137
In Q v Q; Re B; Re C (Private Law: Public Funding) [2014] EWFC 31, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at [2014] Fam Law 1398) Sir James Munby P said that funding should be ‘provided by’ by HMCTS for children proceedings in particular circumstances. A variety of recent cases in the family courts, Administrative Court and Court of Appeal have drawn attention to the weaknesses in the legal aid scheme following the introduction of LASPO.

This series will outline the present funding position of parties in private family proceedings. Any decision of the courts, of the parties and of the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) must start from the welfare of the child (Black LJ in JG v Lord Chancellor and Others [2014] EWCA Civ 656, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at [2014] Fam Law 1221) the only LASPO case to date in the Court of Appeal). Funding is contrasted with the cost of a case. The limited extent to which a party can obtain litigation funding in advance of (save where legal aid is available or as a costs allowance or legal services order) is explained. The role of experts and the particular rigours presented by litigants in person (in the more extreme cases) are explained and their part in Sir James’s concerns is touched upon. The series will continue with:
  • a review of the bases on which legal aid may be granted in the light of the recent case-law (especially LASPO, s 10) (Part 2); and 
  • Speculation on what other avenues – such as those hinted at by the President in Q v Q (Private Law: Public Funding) – may be available to parties for assistance in court (Part 3).

The full version of this article appears in the October 2014 issue of Family Law.

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or for any offers, please contact a member of our sales team: Tel 0117 918 1555, or email: sales.manager@jordanpublishing.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from