Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

State funding for family proceedings after Q v Q (Private Law: Public Funding): Part 1 (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:56 PM
family law, public funding, legal aid, LASPO, litigants in person, access to justice, exceptional funding
In ​Q v Q; Re B; Re C (Private Law: Public Funding) [2014] EWFC 31, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at [2014] Fam Law 1398) Sir James Munby P said that funding should be ‘provided by’ by HMCTS for children proceedings in particular circumstances.
Slug : state-funding-for-family-proceedings-after-q-v-q-private-law-public-funding-part-1
Meta Title : State funding for family proceedings after Q v Q (Private Law: Public Funding): Part 1 (£)
Meta Keywords : family law, public funding, legal aid, LASPO, litigants in person, access to justice, exceptional funding
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 26, 2014, 04:55 AM
Article ID : 107137
In Q v Q; Re B; Re C (Private Law: Public Funding) [2014] EWFC 31, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at [2014] Fam Law 1398) Sir James Munby P said that funding should be ‘provided by’ by HMCTS for children proceedings in particular circumstances. A variety of recent cases in the family courts, Administrative Court and Court of Appeal have drawn attention to the weaknesses in the legal aid scheme following the introduction of LASPO.

This series will outline the present funding position of parties in private family proceedings. Any decision of the courts, of the parties and of the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) must start from the welfare of the child (Black LJ in JG v Lord Chancellor and Others [2014] EWCA Civ 656, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at [2014] Fam Law 1221) the only LASPO case to date in the Court of Appeal). Funding is contrasted with the cost of a case. The limited extent to which a party can obtain litigation funding in advance of (save where legal aid is available or as a costs allowance or legal services order) is explained. The role of experts and the particular rigours presented by litigants in person (in the more extreme cases) are explained and their part in Sir James’s concerns is touched upon. The series will continue with:
  • a review of the bases on which legal aid may be granted in the light of the recent case-law (especially LASPO, s 10) (Part 2); and 
  • Speculation on what other avenues – such as those hinted at by the President in Q v Q (Private Law: Public Funding) – may be available to parties for assistance in court (Part 3).

The full version of this article appears in the October 2014 issue of Family Law.

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or for any offers, please contact a member of our sales team: Tel 0117 918 1555, or email: sales.manager@jordanpublishing.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from