Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

Southend Borough Council v CO and DW [2017] EWHC 1949 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:11 PM
Publicity and reporting – Art 10, European Convention – Online petition – Whether the parents should be compelled to remove petition from website
The local authority application for an injunction compelling the parents to remove an online petition was refused.
Slug : southend-borough-council-v-co-and-dw-2017-ewhc-1949-fam
Meta Title : Southend Borough Council v CO and DW [2017] EWHC 1949 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Publicity and reporting – Art 10, European Convention – Online petition – Whether the parents should be compelled to remove petition from website
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 1, 2017, 09:32 AM
Article ID : 114373

(Family Division, MacDonald J, 28 July 2017)

Publicity and reporting – Art 10, European Convention – Online petition – Whether the parents should be compelled to remove petition from website

The local authority application for an injunction compelling the parents to remove an online petition was refused.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 1949 (Fam)

Case No: FD7P00295

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 28/07/2017

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Southend Borough Council
Applicant

- and -

CO
First Respondent

-and-

DW
Second Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ms Sarah Duxbury (instructed by the Local Authority Solicitor) for the Applicant
The First and Second Respondents appeared in person

Hearing date: 6 July 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved



MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

This judgment was delivered in private. The Judge has given permission for this anonymised version of the judgment (and any of the facts and matters contained in it) to be published on condition always that the names and the addresses of the parties and the children must not be published. For the avoidance of doubt, the strict prohibition on publishing the names and addresses of the parties and the children will continue to apply where that information has been obtained by using the contents of this judgment to discover information already in the public domain. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that these conditions are strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment: 
Southend Borough Council v CO and DW [2017] EWHC 1949 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Publicity and Reporting
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from