Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

S v S [2017] EWHC 3184 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:59 PM
Abduction – Undertakings – Iran – Whether the safeguards offered by the father were sufficient – Whether the child should be returned to Iran
The father’s application for a return order to Iran was refused.
Slug : s-v-s-2017-ewhc-3184-fam
Meta Title : S v S [2017] EWHC 3184 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Abduction – Undertakings – Iran – Whether the safeguards offered by the father were sufficient – Whether the child should be returned to Iran
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 12, 2017, 04:43 AM
Article ID : 116234

(Family Division, Sir Peter Singer, 12 July 2017)

Abduction – Undertakings – Iran – Whether the safeguards offered by the father were sufficient – Whether the child should be returned to Iran

The father’s application for a return order to Iran was refused.




For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 3184 (Fam)
Case No: FD16P00558
IN THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

The Royal Courts of Justice
The Strand
London
WC2A 2LL


Date: Wednesday, 12th July 2017


Before:

SIR PETER SINGER
(Sitting as a Judge of the High Court)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

B E T W E E N:

 S 

and

 S 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MR SAMUEL (instructed by James Maguire and Co) appeared on behalf of the Mother
The Father was unrepresented on this occasion

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT (Approved)


 
Categories :
  • Abduction
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from