Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION/SPECIAL GUARDIANSHIP: S v B and Newport City Council; Re K

Sep 29, 2018, 17:32 PM
Slug : s-v-b-and-newport-city-council-re-k
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 27, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88119

(Family Division; Hedley J; 27 July 2006)

In the case of a grandchild living with the maternal grandparents, together with other members of the wider family, a special guardianship order was more appropriate than an adoption order, even though an adoption order would have reduced the grandparents' anxiety about possible interference from the parents. Special guardianship had been introduced very much to deal with the concept of long-term familial placements that were not required to be secured by care orders. In this case adoption would significantly skew normal family relationships and structures, whereas special guardianship would permit the familial carers to have the practical authority and standing of parents, while leaving intact real and readily comprehensible relationships within the family. In order to allay the rational anxiety about parental interference, the court made: a prohibited steps order preventing the parents from having any direct contact with the child without a court order; a s 91(14) of the Children Act 1989 order without limit of time, preventing the parents from making contact applications without first obtaining permission from the court; and a specific issues order, authorising a change of surname.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from