Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re B (Refusal to Grant Interim Care Order)
Sep 29, 2018, 18:22 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Aug 20, 2012, 05:25 AM
Article ID :99771
(Court of Appeal, Hughes, Tomlinson, Toulson LJJ, 16 August 2012)
The local authority appealed a decision not to grant interim care orders in respect of two children. The family had been subject to social services involvement for a number of years and further concerns were raised when the 17-year-old daughter had a relationship with her quasi-step father and conceived a child.
After the father of the child died the mother and daughter lived together with the baby and care proceedings were initiated. Interim care orders were refused and the local authority appealed.
Although there were reasonable grounds for believing the children were at risk of significant harm due to the mothers' lack of appropriate sexual boundaries the judge was right to conclude that their immediate removal was not necessary or proportionate at an interim stage, and there was no risk in the short term.