Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

FAMILY PROCEEDINGS: Re S-C [2010] EWCA Civ 21

Oct 27, 2018, 06:13 AM
Slug : re-s-c-2010-ewca-civ-21
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 28, 2010, 09:20 AM
Article ID : 86759

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Wall LJ; 28 January 2010)

The mother appealed against a committal order made on the application of the father. The circuit judge found that the wife was in contempt for breaching a non-disclosure order by informing her Turkish lawyer of an English psychologist report describing the father as suffering from a narcissistic personality disorder.

The committal order was set aside on appeal and the mother was found not to be in contempt. The mother had been entitled to show the court's order to third parties and to discuss content of report with her Turkish lawyer. The circuit judge could have made more specific order preventing discussion of report with a third party, but had only specified non-disclosure.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from