Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: Re K (Care Order)

Oct 27, 2018, 06:20 AM
Slug : re-k-care-order-0
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 18, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87027

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Wall LJJ and Hedley J; 12 June 2007) The child was removed from the mother shortly after birth because of concerns about the mother's mental health, both parents' misuse of alcohol and drugs, and the parents' volatile relationship. The mother applied for an assessment by the local family care resource specialist under Children Act 1989, s 38(6). One of the medical assessments before the court suggested that a residential assessment would be very helpful, given the mother's encouraging progress during contact sessions. The judge dismissed the mother's application on the basis that the assessment sought would not address the real issue, which was not the mother's parenting abilities, but her ability to address her drug and alcohol problems.

The court allowed the appeal, noting that the relevance of the assessment sought had been underlined by one of the experts, fortifying the mother's submissions that the assessment would be helpful to the court. Without the assessment the essential requirement of fairness would be jeopardised..

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from