Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: Re H (Abduction) [2006] EWCA Civ 1247

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Slug : re-h-abduction-2006-ewca-civ-1247
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 20, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89195

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Wall LJJ; 20 July 2006)

A 15-year-old child who was refusing to return to the mother in South Africa, the child's country of habitual residence, following a contact visit to the father in the UK, sought to be added as a party to the mother's Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 (Hague Convention) proceedings. She appealed the judge's refusal to add her, arguing that her age constituted exceptional circumstance and, alternatively, that exceptional circumstance was the wrong test to apply given the increasing emphasis in domestic cases on the autonomy of children.

The exceptional circumstance test had not been met simply by virtue of the child's age; the rare reported cases in which a child had been granted separate representation in Hague Convention proceedings were linked by the common thread of some public law dimension. The test for grant of party status to children in child abduction proceedings should certainly not be relaxed; if it were to be revised it should be made more stringent as child abduction cases needed to be conducted more summarily in order to comply with obligations under international and EC law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from