Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Re G and B [2007] EWCA Civ 358

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : re-g-and-b-2007-ewca-civ-358
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 15, 2007, 11:08 AM
Article ID : 85387

(Court of Appeal; Sir Mark Potter P and Wall LJ; 15 March 2007)

In the course of a hearing concerning two children, the mother's foster sister put herself forward as a potential carer. Both the guardian and the local authority opposed an adjournment for assessment of the foster sister, as they considered her unsuitable, and the judge declined to adjourn, making care orders and placement orders. The mother appealed against the orders placing the children for adoption, relying upon Re M-H [2006] EWCA Civ 1864 in arguing that an assessment of the foster sister ought to have been made available for consideration by the court. The authority did not claim that the foster-sister was not a family member because not a blood relative.

Without resiling from anything said in Re M-H [2006] EWCA Civ 1864, there was inevitably a difficulty in extracting statements of principle from an individual case and applying them to a quite different case with different facts. In this case, the local authority had made mistakes, notably the failure to convene a family group conference before the hearing, but those mistakes did not justify reopening the case. The judge had been faced with a last-minute application for an assessment that could and should have been made earlier. Both the local authority and the guardian reasonably took the view that they had sufficient information to make it inappropriate for the case to be adjourned to enable the further assessment to take place. The judge had seen and heard the foster sister, and was entitled to weigh the advantage to the children of being brought up within their natural family against the permanence and security brought about by adoption, taking into account the delay which would be occasioned by adjournment and the likelihood that the assessment of the foster sister would be negative. The available options for a child should be teased out as early as possible, and if a family member wished to be considered he or she should come forward at the earliest possible opportunity. It was the responsibility of the local authority to ensure that its case was properly presented to court, including ensuring that court had the necessary material.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from