Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles

ADOPTION: Re G and B [2007] EWCA Civ 358

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : re-g-and-b-2007-ewca-civ-358
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 15, 2007, 11:08 AM
Article ID : 85387

(Court of Appeal; Sir Mark Potter P and Wall LJ; 15 March 2007)

In the course of a hearing concerning two children, the mother's foster sister put herself forward as a potential carer. Both the guardian and the local authority opposed an adjournment for assessment of the foster sister, as they considered her unsuitable, and the judge declined to adjourn, making care orders and placement orders. The mother appealed against the orders placing the children for adoption, relying upon Re M-H [2006] EWCA Civ 1864 in arguing that an assessment of the foster sister ought to have been made available for consideration by the court. The authority did not claim that the foster-sister was not a family member because not a blood relative.

Without resiling from anything said in Re M-H [2006] EWCA Civ 1864, there was inevitably a difficulty in extracting statements of principle from an individual case and applying them to a quite different case with different facts. In this case, the local authority had made mistakes, notably the failure to convene a family group conference before the hearing, but those mistakes did not justify reopening the case. The judge had been faced with a last-minute application for an assessment that could and should have been made earlier. Both the local authority and the guardian reasonably took the view that they had sufficient information to make it inappropriate for the case to be adjourned to enable the further assessment to take place. The judge had seen and heard the foster sister, and was entitled to weigh the advantage to the children of being brought up within their natural family against the permanence and security brought about by adoption, taking into account the delay which would be occasioned by adjournment and the likelihood that the assessment of the foster sister would be negative. The available options for a child should be teased out as early as possible, and if a family member wished to be considered he or she should come forward at the earliest possible opportunity. It was the responsibility of the local authority to ensure that its case was properly presented to court, including ensuring that court had the necessary material.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from