(Court of Appeal, King, Peter Jackson, Asplin LJJ, 10 June 2020)
Care proceedings – Procedure – Remote hearing
The Court of Appeal dismissed the mother’s appeal, holding that it was in the public interest and the interests of children and families that, wherever it can happen in a safe and fair manner, the work of the courts should continue.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWCA Civ 734
Case No: B4/2020/0715
ZC19C00356
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 10 June 2020
Before :
LADY JUSTICE ASPLIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Re C (Children)(Covid-19: Representation)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tina Cook QC and Joy Brereton (instructed by Powell Spencer & Partners) for the Intervener
Hearing date: 4 June 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Approved Judgment
Judgment: Re C (Children Covid 19 Representation) [2020] EWCA Civ 734
Order by
Newest on top Oldest on top