Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence: Inherent Jurisdiction) [2016] UKSC 4
Sep 29, 2018, 22:49 PM
family law, habitual residence, inherent jurisdiction, non-biological mother, re b, [2016] UKSC 4
The Supreme Court allows the appeal in Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence: Inherent Jurisdiction) [2016] UKSC 4 on the Appellant’s application under the 1989 Act by a majority of 3:2 on the basis that B remained habitually resident in England on 13 February 2014.
Slug :
re-b-a-child-habitual-residence-inherent-jurisdiction-2016-uksc-4
Meta Title :
Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence: Inherent Jurisdiction) [2016] UKSC 4
Meta Keywords :
family law, habitual residence, inherent jurisdiction, non-biological mother, re b, [2016] UKSC 4
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
No
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
No
Date :
Feb 3, 2016, 04:34 AM
Article ID :
111505
[The judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2016] 1 FLR 561]
Hilary Term
[2016] UKSC 4
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 886
JUDGMENT
In the matter of B (A child)
before
Lady Hale, Deputy President
Lord Clarke
Lord Wilson
Lord Sumption
Lord Toulson
JUDGMENT GIVEN ON
3 February 2016
Heard on 8 and 9 December 2015
Categories :
- Judgments
- Private Law Children
Provider :
Product Bucket :
.jpg?sfvrsn=e5a4f948_1)
![Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-desktoplat.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
5 MAR 2021
![Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-moblatest.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
Leave a commentOrder by
Newest on top Oldest on top