The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
APPEALS/FINANCIAL PROVISION: Re A (Trust Fund)  EWCA Civ 1441
Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Dec 1, 2006, 10:58 AM
Article ID :89005
(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Moses LJJ; 9 November 2006)
The trustees of a trust fund set up for the benefit of a child on the basis of an order made by a Family Division judge sought leave to vary the terms of the order. Subsequent unforeseen tax consequences had arisen, primarily because of a mistake as to the child's nationality. The trustees argued that the court had jurisdiction to alter the order, thereby creating a different trust, by reference to s 3 of the Children Act 1989 (the 1989 Act) read with s 8.
Under the 1989 Act the court had jurisdiction to ensure that parental responsibility was properly exercised by the guardian of a child's property. Although initially concerned that the court was being asked to assist with tax planning, the court accepted that there had been an unforeseeable mistake which it was appropriate to correct. However, the case had not needed to be dealt with by means of an appeal to the Court of Appeal; the case could have been dealt with by the Chancery Division exercising the inherent jurisdiction.