Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

APPEALS/FINANCIAL PROVISION: Re A (Trust Fund) [2006] EWCA Civ 1441

Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : re-a-trust-fund-2006-ewca-civ-1441
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 1, 2006, 10:58 AM
Article ID : 89005

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Moses LJJ; 9 November 2006)

The trustees of a trust fund set up for the benefit of a child on the basis of an order made by a Family Division judge sought leave to vary the terms of the order. Subsequent unforeseen tax consequences had arisen, primarily because of a mistake as to the child's nationality. The trustees argued that the court had jurisdiction to alter the order, thereby creating a different trust, by reference to s 3 of the Children Act 1989 (the 1989 Act) read with s 8.

Under the 1989 Act the court had jurisdiction to ensure that parental responsibility was properly exercised by the guardian of a child's property. Although initially concerned that the court was being asked to assist with tax planning, the court accepted that there had been an unforeseeable mistake which it was appropriate to correct. However, the case had not needed to be dealt with by means of an appeal to the Court of Appeal; the case could have been dealt with by the Chancery Division exercising the inherent jurisdiction.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from