Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
View all articles
Authors

APPEALS/FINANCIAL PROVISION: Re A (Trust Fund) [2006] EWCA Civ 1441

Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : re-a-trust-fund-2006-ewca-civ-1441
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 1, 2006, 10:58 AM
Article ID : 89005

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Moses LJJ; 9 November 2006)

The trustees of a trust fund set up for the benefit of a child on the basis of an order made by a Family Division judge sought leave to vary the terms of the order. Subsequent unforeseen tax consequences had arisen, primarily because of a mistake as to the child's nationality. The trustees argued that the court had jurisdiction to alter the order, thereby creating a different trust, by reference to s 3 of the Children Act 1989 (the 1989 Act) read with s 8.

Under the 1989 Act the court had jurisdiction to ensure that parental responsibility was properly exercised by the guardian of a child's property. Although initially concerned that the court was being asked to assist with tax planning, the court accepted that there had been an unforeseeable mistake which it was appropriate to correct. However, the case had not needed to be dealt with by means of an appeal to the Court of Appeal; the case could have been dealt with by the Chancery Division exercising the inherent jurisdiction.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from