The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
I have before me a number of applications which arise in relation to an elderly lady, A, whose affairs have been administered for almost 60 years by the Court of Protection, by its predecessor the ‘old’ Court of Protection, and, before that, pursuant to an inquisition held in 1959. Each of the applications is made by or against A’s nephew, Desmond Maurice Fitzgerald.
Meta Title :Re A (A Patient)  EWCOP 38
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Aug 19, 2016, 02:07 AM
Article ID :114736
(Court of Protection, Sir James Munby P, 10 August 2016)
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has since, on 18 August 2016, given leave for the judgment to be published on condition that neither A nor C is to be named: see Re A (A Patient), Re applications by and against Desmond Maurice Fitzgerald (No 2)  EWCOP 39, para 14. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
Case No: 95908524 Neutral Citation Number:  EWCOP 38
COURT OF PROTECTION
Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL
Date: 10 August 2016
SIR JAMES MUNBY PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In the matter of A (A Patient)
In the matter of applications by and against Desmond Maurice Fitzgerald