Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:11 PM
Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered only indirect contact with the father.
Slug : re-a-2014-ewhc-4836-fam
Meta Title : Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 29, 2015, 06:00 AM
Article ID : 109701
(Family Division, Moylan J, 13 June 2014)

Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered

The full judgment is attached below

In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered only indirect contact with the father.



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

No. SE09P00088

FAMILY DIVISION

[2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice

Friday, 13th June 2014

Before:

MR. JUSTICE MOYLAN
(In Private)

Re A (A Child)
__________

Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
One Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HR
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com
__________

THE APPLICANT appeared In Person.
MS. STANISTREET, of Counsel, appeared on behalf of the First Respondent.
MS. PEMBERTON appeared on behalf of the Children's Guardian.
__________

J U D G M E N T
(As approved by the Judge)


Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from