Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Sep 29, 2018, 22:11 PM
Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered only indirect contact with the father.
Slug :
re-a-2014-ewhc-4836-fam
Meta Title :
Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Meta Keywords :
Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
No
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
No
Date :
Jun 29, 2015, 06:00 AM
Article ID :
109701
(Family Division,
Moylan J, 13 June 2014)
Private law children –
Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with
the father should be ordered
The full judgment is attached below
In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered
only indirect contact with the father.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
No. SE09P00088
FAMILY DIVISION
[2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Royal Courts of Justice
Friday, 13th June 2014
Before:
MR. JUSTICE MOYLAN
(In Private)
Re A (A Child)
__________
Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
One Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HR
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com
__________
THE APPLICANT appeared In Person.
MS. STANISTREET, of Counsel, appeared on behalf of the First Respondent.
MS. PEMBERTON appeared on behalf of the Children's Guardian.
__________
J U D G M E N T
(As approved by the Judge)
Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Categories :
- Judgments
- Private Law Children
Provider :
.jpg?sfvrsn=e5a4f948_1)
![JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-desktoplat.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
5 MAR 2021
![JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-moblatest.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
Leave a commentOrder by
Newest on top Oldest on top