Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:11 PM
Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered only indirect contact with the father.
Slug : re-a-2014-ewhc-4836-fam
Meta Title : Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 29, 2015, 06:00 AM
Article ID : 109701
(Family Division, Moylan J, 13 June 2014)

Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered

The full judgment is attached below

In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered only indirect contact with the father.



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

No. SE09P00088

FAMILY DIVISION

[2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice

Friday, 13th June 2014

Before:

MR. JUSTICE MOYLAN
(In Private)

Re A (A Child)
__________

Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
One Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HR
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com
__________

THE APPLICANT appeared In Person.
MS. STANISTREET, of Counsel, appeared on behalf of the First Respondent.
MS. PEMBERTON appeared on behalf of the Children's Guardian.
__________

J U D G M E N T
(As approved by the Judge)


Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from