Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:11 PM
Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered only indirect contact with the father.
Slug : re-a-2014-ewhc-4836-fam
Meta Title : Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 29, 2015, 06:00 AM
Article ID : 109701
(Family Division, Moylan J, 13 June 2014)

Private law children – Contact – Intractable contact dispute – Whether direct or indirect contact with the father should be ordered

The full judgment is attached below

In this intractable contact dispute the judge ordered only indirect contact with the father.



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

No. SE09P00088

FAMILY DIVISION

[2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice

Friday, 13th June 2014

Before:

MR. JUSTICE MOYLAN
(In Private)

Re A (A Child)
__________

Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
One Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HR
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com
__________

THE APPLICANT appeared In Person.
MS. STANISTREET, of Counsel, appeared on behalf of the First Respondent.
MS. PEMBERTON appeared on behalf of the Children's Guardian.
__________

J U D G M E N T
(As approved by the Judge)


Re A [2014] EWHC 4836 (Fam)
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from