Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

Radmacher: What Practitioners Need from the Supreme Court

Sep 29, 2018, 17:15 PM
Slug : radmacher-what-practitioners-need-from-the-supreme-court
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 5, 2010, 12:16 PM
Article ID : 87677

ANDREW MEEHAN, Senior Solicitor, Mills & Reeve

The appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision in Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] 2 FLR 1181 is due to be heard, as at the time of writing, by the Supreme Court towards the end of March 2010. Not only will the decision represent the highest profile ancillary relief case to be heard by the Supreme Court so far since replacing the House of Lords but the decision will also generate vast interest by virtue of its topic alone, namely the enforceability of pre-marital agreements.

Readers of Family Law will be familiar with the background facts of the Radmacher case itself, set out in the first instance decision of Baron J, reported as NG v KR (Prenuptial Contract) [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam), [2009] 1 FLR 1478 and in the Court of Appeal's decision. Both decisions were reviewed in detail in 'Analyse This: Radmacher v Granatino' [2009] Fam Law 816 and commented on in a number of articles since then including 'Pre-Nuptial Agreements: For Better or for Worse?' by R George, P Harris and J Herring [2009] Fam Law 934 and by E Hitchings in 'From Pre-Nups to Post-Nups: Dealing with Marital Property Agreements' [2009] Fam Law 1066 being notable examples.

The purpose of this article is to consider, in advance of the hearing before the Supreme Court, some of the practical issues raised by the Court of Appeal's decision and the particular issues on which guidance from the Supreme Court in its decision would be helpful to practitioners and to clients.

To read the rest of this article, see March [2010] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from