Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles

LOCAL AUTHORITY: R (Collins) v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2551 (Admin)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:09 PM
Slug : r-collins-v-knowsley-metropolitan-borough-council-2008-ewhc-2551-admin
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 29, 2008, 11:26 AM
Article ID : 87109

(Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court; Michael Supperstone QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court; 29 October 2008)

The teenage girl was referred to the local authority's children and families' team because of concerns about her school attendance. The girl's stepfather had parental responsibility for her, but she did not spend much time in his care. The authority became aware that the girl was in fact living with her boyfriend's mother, and arranged a planning meeting to discuss her future. Shortly afterwards, the step-father died; after discussions with the authority the boyfriend's mother indicated that she was willing to look after the girl on a long-term basis. The boyfriend's mother then applied for fostering allowance in respect of the girl, but was refused on the basis that the girl was not a 'looked after child' for the purposes of Children Act 1989, s 22(1).

The local authority had been under a duty to provide accommodation for the child, under Children Act 1989, s 20, and had organised a placement for the child with the boyfriend's mother. The authority was therefore obliged to pay the boyfriend's mother the appropriate weekly fostering allowance.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from