Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

LOCAL AUTHORITY: R (Collins) v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2551 (Admin)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:09 PM
Slug : r-collins-v-knowsley-metropolitan-borough-council-2008-ewhc-2551-admin
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 29, 2008, 11:26 AM
Article ID : 87109

(Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court; Michael Supperstone QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court; 29 October 2008)

The teenage girl was referred to the local authority's children and families' team because of concerns about her school attendance. The girl's stepfather had parental responsibility for her, but she did not spend much time in his care. The authority became aware that the girl was in fact living with her boyfriend's mother, and arranged a planning meeting to discuss her future. Shortly afterwards, the step-father died; after discussions with the authority the boyfriend's mother indicated that she was willing to look after the girl on a long-term basis. The boyfriend's mother then applied for fostering allowance in respect of the girl, but was refused on the basis that the girl was not a 'looked after child' for the purposes of Children Act 1989, s 22(1).

The local authority had been under a duty to provide accommodation for the child, under Children Act 1989, s 20, and had organised a placement for the child with the boyfriend's mother. The authority was therefore obliged to pay the boyfriend's mother the appropriate weekly fostering allowance.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from