Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles

PROPERTY: Kernott v Jones [2010] EWCA (Civ) 578

Sep 29, 2018, 17:54 PM
Slug : property-kernott-v-jones-2010-ewca-civ-578
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 1, 2010, 12:30 PM
Article ID : 90995

(Court of Appeal; Sir Nicholas Wall P, Jacob, and Rimer LJJ; 26 May 2010)

The couple bought a joint property in 1985 with the wife providing the deposit from the proceeds of the sale of a caravan and the balance was funded by an interest only mortgage which they shared. They had two children. The father extended the property thereby increasing its value. He then moved out and bought another property in 1993 leaving the mother with the children. The mother alone funded the property and other outgoings for her and the children for 12 years.  The father then severed the joint tenancy and sought his half share. The mother sought a declaration under TLATA 1996 that she owned the entire beneficial interest in the property. The judge made a declaration that the beneficial interest was split 90% to 10% in favour of the mother, that decision was upheld on appeal. The father appealed.

Appeal allowed. It was for the wife to displace the presumption of equality arising form the joint legal title, and the evidence from the judge's findings was insufficient to do so. The parties agreed that as at the point of separation their equitable interests would have been equal, so evidence was needed to demonstrate that the common intention had changed since separation.


Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from