Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

PROPERTY: Kernott v Jones [2010] EWCA (Civ) 578

Sep 29, 2018, 17:54 PM
Slug : property-kernott-v-jones-2010-ewca-civ-578
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 1, 2010, 12:30 PM
Article ID : 90995

(Court of Appeal; Sir Nicholas Wall P, Jacob, and Rimer LJJ; 26 May 2010)

The couple bought a joint property in 1985 with the wife providing the deposit from the proceeds of the sale of a caravan and the balance was funded by an interest only mortgage which they shared. They had two children. The father extended the property thereby increasing its value. He then moved out and bought another property in 1993 leaving the mother with the children. The mother alone funded the property and other outgoings for her and the children for 12 years.  The father then severed the joint tenancy and sought his half share. The mother sought a declaration under TLATA 1996 that she owned the entire beneficial interest in the property. The judge made a declaration that the beneficial interest was split 90% to 10% in favour of the mother, that decision was upheld on appeal. The father appealed.

Appeal allowed. It was for the wife to displace the presumption of equality arising form the joint legal title, and the evidence from the judge's findings was insufficient to do so. The parties agreed that as at the point of separation their equitable interests would have been equal, so evidence was needed to demonstrate that the common intention had changed since separation.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from