Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Potanin v Potanina [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)

Nov 14, 2019, 13:19 PM
Financial Remedies – Divorce – Husband applied to set aside order giving wife leave to apply for financial relief.
The Family Division dismissed the wife’s application for leave to apply for financial relief. If the claim was allowed to proceed, there would effectively be no limit to divorce tourism.
Slug :
Meta Title : Potanin v Potanina [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial Remedies – Divorce – Husband applied to set aside order giving wife leave to apply for financial relief.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 14, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Cohen J, 8 November 2019)

Financial Remedies – Divorce – Husband applied to set aside order giving wife leave to apply for financial relief.

The Family Division dismissed the wife’s application for leave to apply for financial relief. If the claim was allowed to proceed, there would effectively be no limit to divorce tourism.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)

Case No: FD18F00074

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 08/11/2019

Before :

MR JUSTICE COHEN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

VLADIMIR OLEGOVICH POTANIN
Applicant

- and -

NATALIA NIKOLAEVNA POTANINA
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Tim Bishop QC and Rebecca Bailey-Harris (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the Applicant husband
Charles Howard QC & Deepak Nagpal (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers) for the Respondent wife

Hearing dates: 3rd – 4th October 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE COHEN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Potanin v Potanina [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from