Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

Potanin v Potanina [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)

Nov 14, 2019, 13:19 PM
Financial Remedies – Divorce – Husband applied to set aside order giving wife leave to apply for financial relief.
The Family Division dismissed the wife’s application for leave to apply for financial relief. If the claim was allowed to proceed, there would effectively be no limit to divorce tourism.
Slug :
Meta Title : Potanin v Potanina [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial Remedies – Divorce – Husband applied to set aside order giving wife leave to apply for financial relief.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 14, 2019, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Cohen J, 8 November 2019)

Financial Remedies – Divorce – Husband applied to set aside order giving wife leave to apply for financial relief.

The Family Division dismissed the wife’s application for leave to apply for financial relief. If the claim was allowed to proceed, there would effectively be no limit to divorce tourism.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)

Case No: FD18F00074

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 08/11/2019

Before :

MR JUSTICE COHEN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

VLADIMIR OLEGOVICH POTANIN
Applicant

- and -

NATALIA NIKOLAEVNA POTANINA
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Tim Bishop QC and Rebecca Bailey-Harris (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the Applicant husband
Charles Howard QC & Deepak Nagpal (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers) for the Respondent wife

Hearing dates: 3rd – 4th October 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE COHEN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Potanin v Potanina [2019] EWHC 2956 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from