Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Book Review on Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
It is 27 years since Denzil Lush first produced this book, some subsequent editions of which one has had the pleasure of reviewing for Family Law, and which, for some reason, does not figure as much...
Re AC (A Child) [2020] EWFC 90
(Family Court, Peel J, 11 December 2020)Private Law Children – s 8, Children Act 1989 – Inheritance - Jurisdiction Whether court had jurisdiction to authorise the mother to accept the...
Second reading in the House of Lords of the Domestic Abuse Bill
The Domestic Abuse Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords on 5 January 2021. The committee stage, where the bill will be scrutinised line-by-line, does not yet have a confirmed date....
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
How the care system should change - a child’s perspective
The Children’s Commissioner has published a new investigation into how children affected by the care system would like the current system to change ahead of the government’s planned...
View all articles
Authors

Out of court family dispute resolution: lessons from experience

Sep 29, 2018, 21:50 PM
Drawing on the preliminary findings of the three year ESRC-funded Mapping Paths to Family Justice research project being undertaken by the Universities of Exeter and Kent, this paper will consider the perceived strengths and weaknesses of three forms of o
Slug : out-of-court-family-dispute-resolution-lessons-from-experience
Meta Title : Out of court family dispute resolution: lessons from experience
Meta Keywords : family law reforms, mediation, gender, dispute resolution, collaborative law
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 30, 2014, 10:20 AM
Article ID : 105641

Family Law special issue

Anne Barlow, Professor of Family Law and Policy at the University of Exeter and academic member of the Family Justice Council

Drawing on the preliminary findings of the three year ESRC-funded Mapping Paths to Family Justice research project being undertaken by the Universities of Exeter and Kent, this paper will consider the perceived strengths and weaknesses of three forms of out of court family dispute resolution - solicitor negotiation, mediation and collaborative law - as experienced by parties.  In so doing, it will consider what parties' experiences of these processes provisionally reveal about shifting notions of justice being delivered by out-of-court dispute resolution.  In particular, is the delegated empowerment to reach agreement out of court - now overtly encouraged by recent reforms - displacing the need for such disputes to be negotiated in the shadow of the law?  The paper will argue that whilst out of court dispute resolution can often be beneficial, more attention needs to be placed on gender and power issues alongside assuring the quality of practitioner.  In addition, the presentation of real and appropriate choice of dispute resolution process to parties is critical to its likely success or failure.

The full version of this article appears in the May Special Issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full article here 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from