Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

Openness - Refocusing the Debate

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Slug : openness-refocusing-the-debate
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 22, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89135

Alistair MacDonald, Joint Chair, Association of Lawyers for Children, Barrister, St Philips Chambers, Birmingham. The Department for Constitutional Affairs' consultation paper 'Confidence and Confidentiality: Improving Transparency and Privacy in Family Courts' stipulates that the primary motivation for consulting on the issue of greater openness is to increase public confidence in the court system. The author makes clear from the outset that he does not seek to argue against greater openness in the family courts per se. There is a need for better public understanding of the role of the courts in safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children, and of how the court process achieves that aim. There is a need to address the complex and piecemeal legal provisions that currently govern confidentiality in different ways at different levels within the family justice system. The author seeks rather to demonstrate that the current debate on this issue, while illuminating certain problems within the system, has excluded, and risks continuing to exclude to an unusual degree the interests of children. This in turn risks a failure to consider the key practical issues necessary to ensure that the interests of children are protected within the context of debating greater openness in the family courts. When considering different methods of increasing openness we need to refocus the debate to bring the interests and views of children and young people back to its centre. We need then to consider the key practical issues highlighted by a debate from this perspective. See October [2006] Fam Law for the full article.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from