Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

No early closing for forum shopping: Mittal v Mittal

Sep 29, 2018, 18:55 PM
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Mittal v Mittal [2013] EWCA 1255, [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming) has confirmed that the English courts have jurisdiction to stay matrimonial proceedings in England where there are parallel proceedings in a non-Member St
Slug : no-early-closing-for-forum-shopping-mittal-v-mittal
Meta Title : No early closing for forum shopping: Mittal v Mittal
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 5, 2013, 01:04 AM
Article ID : 104253

Charlotte Sanders, Solicitor, Vardags:

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Mittal v Mittal [2013] EWCA 1255, [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming)  has confirmed that the English courts have jurisdiction to stay matrimonial proceedings in England where there are parallel proceedings in a non-Member State. In deciding this, the Court has made clear that the controversial civil case of Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801 does not apply in the family context, settling the academic debate that has been raging since its decision.

Although the judgment deals with technical and complex legal arguments, it is a hugely relevant and important decision in an era where the English courts are seen as the divorce capital of the world, but where families are increasingly international. Family practitioners should take note.

The full version of this article appears in the December 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from