Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Neil v Neil [2019] EWHC 3330 (Fam)

Jan 8, 2020, 11:07 AM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Application to set aside part of consent order on basis of fraud
The Family Court set aside part of the final order and made a declaration that the wife owed the husband £248,930 from the sale of the matrimonial home. The wife’s cross-applications were dismissed.
Slug :
Meta Title : Neil v Neil [2019] EWHC 3330 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Court, Moor J, 22 November 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Application to set aside part of consent order on basis of fraud

The Family Court set aside part of the final order and made a declaration that the wife owed the husband £248,930 from the sale of the matrimonial home. The wife’s cross-applications were dismissed.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


IMPORTANT NOTICE
This judgment was delivered in private, but the judge has given permission for this version of the
judgment to be published. It follows that those people named in this judgment can be identified

but the firm of solicitors, referred to in the judgment as “XYZ” cannot be identified and the firm’s anonymity must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3330 (fam)

Case No: ZC14D03637

IN THE FAMILY COURT

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 22 November 2019

Before :

Mr Justice Moor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

Terry John Neil

Applicant

-and-

Soraya Jasmine Neil (aka as Henderson)

Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ms Deborah Bangay QC for the Applicant (instructed by Hughmans)
The Respondent appeared in person

Hearing dates: 18 to 22 November 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

 

Judgment: Neil v Neil [2019] EWHC 3330 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from