Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Moutreuil v Andreewitch (Contempt: No 2) [2020] EWHC 1301 (Fam)

Jun 12, 2020, 10:55 AM
Contempt — Freezing order – Rehearing
The Family Division held that the respondent had breached the freezing order by making/procuring the transfers/payments set out in the applicant's notice and that such breaches were deliberate.
Slug :
Meta Title : Moutreuil v Andreewitch (Contempt: No 2) [2020] EWHC 1301 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Contempt — Freezing order – Rehearing
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 11, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Cobb J, 22 May 2020)

Contempt — Freezing order – Rehearing

The Family Division held that the respondent had breached the freezing order by making/procuring the transfers/payments set out in the applicant's notice and that such breaches were deliberate.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 1301 (Fam)

Case No: FD19F00024
ZC18P04081

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 22/05/2020

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE COBB

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Magali Moutreuil
Applicant

- and -

Peter Andreewitch
Pier Investments Company Limited
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Moutreuil v Andreewitch (Contempt: No.2)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

James Weale (instructed by LSGA Solicitors) for the Applicant
Richard Thomas (instructed by Janes Solicitors) for the First Respondent
The Second Respondent was not separately represented

Hearing date: 18 May 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE COBB

This judgment was delivered in public, albeit remotely.
The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published.

Judgment: Moutreuil v Andreewitch [2020] EWHC 1301 (Fam)

Categories :
  • Contempt of Court
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from