Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

Medway Council v Root [2019] EWHC 669 (Fam) and Root v Medway Council [2019] EWHC 1640

Sep 12, 2019, 14:39 PM
Reporting restrictions – Committal application – Hyperlink to judgment – Video recording of judgment being read – Publishing judgment.
The Family Division found that the mother had breached the orders made, however, she was permitted to purge her contempt as the purposes for which committal had been sought had been achieved.
Slug :
Meta Title : Medway Council v Root [2019] EWHC 669 (Fam) and Root v Medway Council [2019] EWHC 1640
Meta Keywords : Reporting restrictions – Committal application – Hyperlink to judgment – Video recording of judgment being read – Publishing judgment.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 11, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Theis J, Family Division, 25 February 2019 and 6 March 2019)

Reporting restrictions – Committal application – Hyperlink to judgment – Video recording of judgment being read – Publishing judgment.

The Family Division found that the mother had breached the orders made, however, she was permitted to purge her contempt as the purposes for which committal had been sought had been achieved.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


This judgment was handed down in open court. The anonymity of the children must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

The publication of this judgment is also subject to a Reporting Restrictions Order made on 11.05.18 so that this judgment OR HYPERLINKS OR CITATIONS TO THE JUDGMENT is not to be published: (a) in conjunction with any other material that names the children or identifies them by photograph or any other image; or (b) on any on-line page containing any other material that names the children or identifies them by photograph or image where the existence of that material is known to the publisher.

Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 669 (Fam)

Case No: ME16C01627

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 25/02/2019 and 6/03/2019

Before:

MRS JUSTICE THEIS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Medway Council
Applicant

- and -

Sara Jayne Root
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Edward Elliott (instructed by Medway CC) for the Applicant
Mr William Dean (instructed by Sternberg Reed) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 20th & 25th February & 6th March 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

 

Judgments: Medway Council v Root [2019] EWHC 669 (Fam) and Root v Medway Council [2019] EWHC 1640

 

 

 

 


Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Publicity and Reporting
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from