Managing the finances of a missing person—is the law missing something?
Feb 1, 2019, 08:01 AM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Feb 1, 2019, 08:00 AM
Article ID :
Sarah Young, partner at Ridley & Hall Solicitors, discusses the current UK laws surrounding the management of the finances of a missing person. In particular, Young explores the subject in the context of a recent finding that there have been a lower number of applications under the Presumption of Death Act 2013 (PDA 2013) than anticipated.
What is the context surrounding the introduction of PDA 2013? Why was the law before the introduction of PDA 2013 not effective?
It is an astounding fact that around 250,000 people go missing in the UK each year. Approximately 2000 people remain missing after 12 months. For the families affected, a disappearance can be emotionally—and financially—devastating.
Prior to PDA 2013, a ‘crazy paving’ of legislation and rules governed the law in this area, which was difficult to navigate and did not provide solutions for all the issues that can arise.
In the meantime, the only effective way to manage a missing person’s finances and property for a left behind family in England and Wales is to apply for a declaration of presumed death under PDA 2013, which came into force in October 2014.
What is the procedure for the issuing of a presumption of death certificate under PDA 2013?
If the missing person is presumed to have died—by way of suspected murder, suicide or misadventure—an application can be made at any point after the disappearance for a declaration of presumed death under PDA 2013. A declaration can be made where a person who is missing:
The application is to the High Court by a Part 8 claim form and should be made by the spouse or civil partner, parent, child or sibling of the missing person. The court may refuse to give permission to anyone else if the applicant does not have a ‘sufficient interest’. In a contested case of mine in 2016, my client was a cohabitee, and the judge was not convinced that she was entitled to apply on that basis alone. However, the judge allowed her to bring the claim as she was also the executrix of the missing person’s will and owned a property jointly with him.
Want to access the rest of this story? To read the balance of this article click here (subscription required). This news analysis was first published by LexisPSL Family. To request a free one week trial click here.