Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

London Borough of Redbridge v A, B and E (Failure to Comply with Directions) [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:32 PM
Practice and procedure – Case management – Care proceedings – Local authority repeatedly failed to comply with directions
MacDonald J reiterated the importance of local authorities complying with case management directions.
Slug : london-borough-of-redbridge-v-a-b-and-e-failure-to-comply-with-directions-2016-ewhc-2627-fam
Meta Title : London Borough of Redbridge v A, B and E (Failure to Comply with Directions) [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Case management – Care proceedings – Local authority repeatedly failed to comply with directions
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 1, 2016, 05:18 AM
Article ID : 113293

(Family Division, MacDonald J, 17 October 2016)

Practice and procedure – Case management – Care proceedings – Local authority repeatedly failed to comply with directions

MacDonald J reiterated the importance of local authorities complying with case management directions.


Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam)

Case No: UO14C00046
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 17/10/2016

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

London Borough of Redbridge
Applicant

-and-

A
First Respondent

-and-

B
Second Respondent

-and-

E
(By her Children’s Guardian)
Third Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Paul Pavlou (instructed by London Borough of Redbridge) for the Applicant
Ms Esther Maclachlan (instructed by Sternberg Reed) for the First Respondent
The Second Respondent did not appear and was not represented
Ms Tara Vindis (instructed by Gary Jacobs Solicitors) for the Third Respondent


Hearing dates: 17 October 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment Approved


THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

This judgment was delivered in private. The Judge has given permission for this anonymised version of the judgment (and any of the facts and matters contained in it) to be published on condition always that the names and the addresses of the parties and the children must not be published. For the avoidance of doubt, the strict prohibition on publishing the names and addresses of the parties and the children will continue to apply where that information has been obtained by using the contents of this judgment to discover information already in the public domain. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that these conditions are strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


London Borough of Redbridge v A, B and E [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam).rtf

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from