Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

London Borough of Redbridge v A, B and E (Failure to Comply with Directions) [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:32 PM
Practice and procedure – Case management – Care proceedings – Local authority repeatedly failed to comply with directions
MacDonald J reiterated the importance of local authorities complying with case management directions.
Slug : london-borough-of-redbridge-v-a-b-and-e-failure-to-comply-with-directions-2016-ewhc-2627-fam
Meta Title : London Borough of Redbridge v A, B and E (Failure to Comply with Directions) [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Practice and procedure – Case management – Care proceedings – Local authority repeatedly failed to comply with directions
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 1, 2016, 05:18 AM
Article ID : 113293

(Family Division, MacDonald J, 17 October 2016)

Practice and procedure – Case management – Care proceedings – Local authority repeatedly failed to comply with directions

MacDonald J reiterated the importance of local authorities complying with case management directions.


Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam)

Case No: UO14C00046
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 17/10/2016

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

London Borough of Redbridge
Applicant

-and-

A
First Respondent

-and-

B
Second Respondent

-and-

E
(By her Children’s Guardian)
Third Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr Paul Pavlou (instructed by London Borough of Redbridge) for the Applicant
Ms Esther Maclachlan (instructed by Sternberg Reed) for the First Respondent
The Second Respondent did not appear and was not represented
Ms Tara Vindis (instructed by Gary Jacobs Solicitors) for the Third Respondent


Hearing dates: 17 October 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment Approved


THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD

This judgment was delivered in private. The Judge has given permission for this anonymised version of the judgment (and any of the facts and matters contained in it) to be published on condition always that the names and the addresses of the parties and the children must not be published. For the avoidance of doubt, the strict prohibition on publishing the names and addresses of the parties and the children will continue to apply where that information has been obtained by using the contents of this judgment to discover information already in the public domain. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that these conditions are strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


London Borough of Redbridge v A, B and E [2016] EWHC 2627 (Fam).rtf

Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Practice and Procedure
Tags :
FLR
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from