Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
View all articles
Authors

London Borough of Hackney v Williams and Another [2017] EWCA Civ 26

Sep 29, 2018, 19:41 PM
Public law children – Emergency protection order – Parents brought proceedings against local authority – Whether there had been a breach of the duty under s 6 of the HRA 1998
The local authority appeal from a decision finding it had breached s 20 of the Children Act 1989 was allowed.
Slug : london-borough-of-hackney-v-williams-and-another-2017-ewca-civ-26
Meta Title : London Borough of Hackney v Williams and Another [2017] EWCA Civ 26
Meta Keywords : Public law children – Emergency protection order – Parents brought proceedings against local authority – Whether there had been a breach of the duty under s 6 of the HRA 1998
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 27, 2017, 04:09 AM
Article ID : 113664

(Court of Appeal, Sir Brian Leveson, President of the Queen’s Bench Division, McFarlane, Burnett LJJ, 26 January 2017)

Public law children – Emergency protection order – Parents brought proceedings against local authority – Whether there had been a breach of the duty under s 6 of the HRA 1998

The local authority appeal from a decision finding it had breached s 20 of the Children Act 1989 was allowed.

The parents, of 8 children placed in local authority care, pursued the local authority, claiming misfeasance in public office, race discrimination, negligence and breach of duty owed pursuant to s 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and Art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. After a 6-day hearing the judge dismissed the actions for misfeasance, discrimination and negligence but found that the local authority had failed to comply with its statutory duty under the Children Act 1989 and were liable to pay damages for breach of Art 8 of the European Convention. The parents were each awarded £10,000 in damages. The local authority appealed.

The appeal was allowed. The Court of Appeal held that the claim brought under s 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 should have been dismissed.

Insofar as breach of statutory duty under s 20 was concerned it was necessary for the claimants to go further than establishing that the actions of the local authority fell short of what, subsequently identified, good practice might require; the authority must be seen to have acted in breach of the terms of the statute. Furthermore, on the basis that the lawfully imposed bail conditions on the parents (not to have unsupervised contact with the children) prevented the parents from providing accommodation for the children, the finding that the retention of the children in police protection after the period of 72 hours was unlawful and, equally, that such retention constituted a breach of the parents' Article 8 rights should be reversed. The interference was in accordance with the law and necessary for the protection of the health or the rights and freedoms of others. It followed that there was no breach of s 6 of the 1998 Act and damages should not have been awarded under s 8.

Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 26
Case No: A2/2015/3251
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
Sir Robert Francis Q.C. sitting as a deputy High Court Judge
HQ13X03397
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 26/01/2017
Before:


THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
(SIR BRIAN LEVESON)
LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE
LORD JUSTICE BURNETT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between:


LONDON BOROUGH OF HACKNEY
Appellant


- and -


(1) JOHN WILLIAMS
(2) ADENIKE WILLIAMS
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Ali Reza Sinai (instructed by Dawn Carter-McDonald, Legal and Democratic Services, London Borough of Hackney) for the Appellant
Christine Cooper and Eirwen Pierrot (instructed by Sky Solicitors, Ilford) 
for the Respondents


Hearing date : 23 November 2016


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment Approved

London Borough of Hackney v Williams and Another [2017] EWCA Civ 26.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Public Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from