Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL PROVISION: Lake v Lake (2006) The Times August 16

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Wall LJJ; 20 July 2006) [2006] 2 FLR (forthcoming)
Slug : lake-v-lake-2006-the-times-august-16
Meta Title : FINANCIAL PROVISION: Lake v Lake (2006) The Times August 16
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 20, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89125

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Wall LJJ; 20 July 2006) [2006] 2 FLR (forthcoming)

The judge had to take a balanced and fair decision as to which of the parties should have the benefit of a joint tenancy following the dissolution of the marriage, having regard to all the circumstances of the case including conduct of the parties. If the absence of express reference in Sch 7, para 5 of the Family Law Act 1996, dealing with transfer of tenancies on divorce, to s 33(6)(d) of the Family Law Act 1996 dealing with occupation orders, were to be construed as placing a fundamental limitation on the court's discretion to consider conduct, all sorts of practical difficulties would arise.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from