Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
IMMIGRATION/HUMAN RIGHTS: Konstatinov v Netherlands
Sep 29, 2018, 17:15 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Apr 26, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID :87591
(European Court of Human Rights; 26 April 2007)
The wife had twice been denied a residence permit to stay in the Netherlands with the husband, who held a permanent residence permit but did not comply with the minimum income requirement under the relevant rules in respect of family reunion. The wife was then declared an undesirable alien on account of her criminal record in the Netherlands, entailing a 5-year exclusion order. The wife, threatened with expulsion, argued that the exclusion order breached her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, Art 8.
The Netherlands had not failed to strike a fair balance between the wife's interests and the state's own interest in controlling immigration and public expenditure and in the prevention of disorder or crime. There had been no violation of Art 8.