Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

IMMIGRATION/HUMAN RIGHTS: Konstatinov v Netherlands

Sep 29, 2018, 17:15 PM
Slug : konstatinov-v-netherlands
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 26, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87591

(European Court of Human Rights; 26 April 2007)

The wife had twice been denied a residence permit to stay in the Netherlands with the husband, who held a permanent residence permit but did not comply with the minimum income requirement under the relevant rules in respect of family reunion. The wife was then declared an undesirable alien on account of her criminal record in the Netherlands, entailing a 5-year exclusion order. The wife, threatened with expulsion, argued that the exclusion order breached her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, Art 8.

The Netherlands had not failed to strike a fair balance between the wife's interests and the state's own interest in controlling immigration and public expenditure and in the prevention of disorder or crime. There had been no violation of Art 8.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from