Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

JUDICIAL REVIEW: R(AB and CD) v Haringey London Borough Council [2013] EWHC 416 (Admin)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:02 PM
Slug : judicial-review-r-ab-and-cd-v-haringey-london-borough-council-2013-ewhc-416-admin
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 20, 2013, 02:37 AM
Article ID : 101915

(Queen's Bench Division, HHJ Anthony Thornton, 13 March 2013)

The mother and father, both experienced, qualified social workers, brought judicial review proceedings in respect of the decision by the local authority to conduct a s 47 enquiry.

The local authority received an anonymous referral from a neighbour of the family saying they heard shouting at the property, that the little girl was dragged along by her arm, slapped and that the little girl looked very unhappy.

The local authority made a number of preliminary investigations including contacting the family GP and school before making contact with the mother and father. When they did so, the parents vehemently denied that it was necessary to investigate the referral and made a number of complaints regarding the local authority's conduct.

Following the telephone call, based on the reaction of the parents, the local authority proceeded with a s 47 enquiry. The parents were informed via letter that an enquiry in line with the allegations against staff procedures would be taking place.

Following a home visit with the parents and speaking with the child alone the decision was taken that no further action was necessary. The parents were notified and informed that it was most likely that the referral had been malicious.

The mother and father brought judicial review proceedings asserting that the decision to abandon the initial assessment and escalate the case to a s 47 enquiry was unlawful and that a decision to do so was never in fact taken but if it was then it was done so without adequate grounds. They claimed that the process was so fundamentally flawed and lacking in the essential minimum requirements that it was unlawful.

The court found that there was never a s 47 enquiry decision and the local authority insistence that one was taken was both erroneous and unlawful. If it had been taken it would have been wholly unreasonable and unsustainable since it would have failed to take into account the most crucial of matters required. The initial data-gathering exercise before and during the initial assessment insofar as the GP and school were contacted without the parents' consent was unlawful.

The mother and father were entitled to a quashing order quashing the purported s 47 enquiry decision and declarations that there never was a s 47 enquiry, that the initial assessment was terminated because the child was not at risk of harm and that the referral was malicious. A further declaration was granted to the effect that the local authority had acted unlawfully in its data gathering.

The further issues of what steps would be taken to insure that all references to the referral and investigation were removed from databases and what amount in damages the claimants were entitled to required further argument.


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from