Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Investing in a child's future: too risky? [2010] CFLQ 1

Sep 29, 2018, 17:49 PM
Slug : investing-in-a-childs-future-too-risky-2010-cflq-1
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 8, 2011, 04:24 AM
Article ID : 95595

 

Risk, with its concern for investment in the future, is now a ubiquitous concept in many areas of policy and practice. This article traces the development of the investment agenda - with its focus on prevention and parental responsibility - in relation to children's services, child protection and youth justice before suggesting that the family courts, dealing with private law cases, have also internalised the management of future risks as all important. To do so the article focuses on contact and paternity cases to argue that the reduction of particular risks to the child's future psychological well-being now outweighs current distress and other relevant factors in judicial decisions about the welfare of the child. Given that such a priority is not supported, as claimed, by clear and undisputed scientific knowledge, this is a trend which merits further attention.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from