Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Impact of Budget changes on family cases

Sep 29, 2018, 21:46 PM
family law, financial remedies, pension sharing, annuity, tax avoidance, Budget 2015, Conservatives, Labour, General Elections, Politics
The 2015 Budget should be viewed as one whose objective is political impact given the polls place the Conservatives and Labour neck and neck.
Slug : impact-of-budget-changes-on-family-cases
Meta Title : Impact of Budget changes on family cases
Meta Keywords : family law, financial remedies, pension sharing, annuity, tax avoidance, Budget 2015, Conservatives, Labour, General Elections, Politics
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 20, 2015, 02:43 AM
Article ID : 108839
Whilst all eyes were anticipated to be on the Budget, George Osborne’s thunder was stolen, somewhat, by the activities of the Federal Reserve and attention turned to Washington as the Fed’s pledge to be 'patient' before raising interest rates, was dropped.

The March 2015 Budget might be seen as a political statement with Conservative strategists wanting Mr Osborne to set the tone for the general election campaign. So whilst it is the Chancellor’s sixth Budget, the objective might be said to be closely aligned with a political message and the focus appears to remain the state of Britain’s public finances and getting the deficit down. So perhaps this Budget should be viewed as one whose objective is political impact given the polls place the Conservatives and Labour neck and neck.

The headline issues which may have impact for family lawyers and financial remedy cases include:

(a) The pension pot lifetime allowance is cut from £1.25m to £1m from 6th April 2016 – a move predicted to generate £600 m for the Treasury. Significant why? The allowance was introduced in 2006. In 2011 it stood at £1.8m and the Budget announcement represents further disincentivisation on saving for retirement. Pension holders pay a 55% tax charge on any amount held over the lifetime limit. There is transitional protection created for those adversely affected. Form April 2018 the lifetime allowance will be indexed, rising in line with the annual increase in the CPI.

(b) In addition, people who have bought an annuity will be allowed to sell the income to a third party and the proceeds could be taken directly or drawn down over time although taxed at the holder’s marginal rate. Relevant to financial remedy proceedings includes the following considerations:

– Pension sharing might be a remedy to overfunding and a means to alleviate the 55% tax charge.

– Think about the client with commercial property currently worth £700,000 and equities and cash of some £200,000 but who is only 48 years of age – is he likely to exceed the allowance by retirement? What predictions can and should be made for growth on the commercial property and equities? Is it in his long term interests to share?

– Are the new reforms (see my March Family Law article, 'The most radical changes to pensions in almost a century') going to create greater flexibility in defeating past liquidity issues in allowing access to pension funds to provide capital for, say housing needs?

c) The personal tax allowance currently stands at £10,000 and rises to £10,600 this April but the Budget announced a further rise from April 2016 to £10,800 and then to £11,000 in April 2017. Frequently when looking at net effect considerations on the division of income at the time of divorce and incentivising divorcees to go back to work, the tax efficiency of a personal allowance is not lost in looking at utilising the earning capacity over time with, perhaps, a corresponding step down in quantum of periodical payments post the making of any order or agreement.

d) There are new and improved anti-avoidance measures with legislation to implement the previously announced changes to the DOTAS (Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes) regime that will be included in the Finance Bill of 2015 due to be published next week. Amongst the proposed changes are:

– Removing the duty of confidentiality from persons who voluntarily disclose information to HMRC to assist HMRC in determining whether there has been a breach of the DOTAS rules. 

– Increasing penalties.

– Empowering HMRC to publish summary information about notified schemes and identify users of undisclosed schemes.

The Government has confirmed that legislation will be introduced in a future Finance Bill to impose further sanctions on serial tax avoiders – increased financial penalties/increased reporting obligations/naming and shaming/restricting access to tax reliefs.

The relevance of this is that in family cases involving high net worth individuals it is not uncommon for there to be complex and sophisticated tax schemes and structures set up with the objective of tax efficient financial planning. Sometimes a case will feature an issue over contingent liabilities – what will be HMRC’s approach to a particular avoidance measure and how such contingent liability should be treated when factoring in the s 25 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 criteria.

Practitioners be alert as yesterday (19 March 2015) the Government was also set to publish plans for new criminal offences for tax evasions and penalties for those professionals who assist tax evaders. Further information on this was not available at the time of compilation of this article.

In A v A; B v B [2000] 1 FLR 701 Mr Justice Charles spoke of the strong obligation of disclosure and the 'strong public interest that all tax, and Revenue penalties due, should be paid…'.

(e) Owner-managed businesses:
 
(i) Individuals wishing to claim entrepreneurs’ relief (ER) on the gain arising on the disposal of a personally held asset that has been used in their business or personal company must, at the same time, make a significant disposal of their share in the business or shareholding in the company. Prior to the budget statement, any disposal out of a material holding was sufficient to trigger ER on disposal.

(ii) Legislation will be amended to require a disposal of an interest representing at least 5% of the assets of the partnership or 5% of the of the ordinary shares or securities of a personal trading company. There must also be no arrangement to reacquire an increased share in the partnership or additional shares in the company.

It is frequently the case in a divorce that liquidity has to be generated by the sale of business assets and ER has been a useful method of minimising the tax hit.

(f) Other potential 'winners' amongst our client base are beer and cider drinkers – the duty on lower strength beer will be cut by 6% and lower strength cider by 2%!

The 2015 Budget can be downloaded here.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
document_3
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from