Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
INJUNCTIONS: Howlett v Holding  EWHC 41 (QB)
Sep 29, 2018, 17:05 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Jan 25, 2006, 05:33 AM
Article ID :85681
(Queen's Bench Division; Eady J; 25 January 2006)
Granting an injunction to a woman who was seeking to restrain a man who had been flying aircraft with banners referring to her, and also secretly surveying her with the aim of supporting his allegations that she was involved in benefit fraud, the judge ruled that secret surveillance was capable of constituting harassment. The defence of preventing or detecting crime had been framed with law enforcement agencies.