Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles

HUMAN RIGHTS/CARE: HK v Finland (Application No 36065/97)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Slug : hk-v-finland-application-no-36065-97
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 10, 2006, 05:52 AM
Article ID : 89213

(European Court of Human Rights; 26 September 2006) [2006] 2 FLR (forthcoming)

The 4-year-old child had been removed from the father on suspicion of sexual abuse. Notwithstanding the father's objections, an emergency care order was made, placing the child with the mother in order that examinations could take place. For a period the child lived with the mother and saw the father only under supervision. Later, further restrictions were placed on the father's access to child. Over 4 years after the original removal, the father having been acquitted of the sexual abuse charges, the child returned to live with the father.

The child had been placed in emergency care in the absence of a formal decision by the authorities, contrary to the provisions of domestic Finnish law. The father had been given no opportunity to contest the restrictions on his access to the child. Accordingly, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from