Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

High Court finds Exceptional Funding scheme unlawful

Sep 29, 2018, 22:13 PM
family law, access to justice, LASPO, legal aid, exceptional case funding, public law project, I.S., Gudanaviciene
The High Court has today handed down a judgment in a test case which will have profound implications for access to justice.
Slug : high-court-finds-exceptional-funding-scheme-unlawful
Meta Title : High Court finds Exceptional Funding scheme unlawful
Meta Keywords : family law, access to justice, LASPO, legal aid, exceptional case funding, public law project, I.S., Gudanaviciene
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 15, 2015, 05:09 AM
Article ID : 109847
The High Court has today handed down a judgment in a test case which will have profound implications for access to justice.

In a further judgment in the case of 'I.S.' Mr Justice Collins has found that the Legal Aid Agency’s current operation of the Exceptional Case Funding (ECF) scheme is unlawful.

ECF was established to act as a 'safety net' to mitigate the significant cuts to legal aid otherwise contained in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO). It was meant to protect those whose fundamental rights would be breached in the absence of legal assistance. The scheme is administered by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice.

The case was brought by the Official Solicitor of England and Wales on behalf of a claimant known as 'I.S.' I.S. is blind, has profound cognitive impairments, lacks litigation capacity and is unable to care for himself. I.S., like many others, had been refused ECF.

An earlier judgment had already established that I.S. was properly entitled to ECF and that the restrictive ECF guidance published by the then Lord Chancellor was incorrect and unlawful. The Official Solicitor then pursued a wider public interest claim out of general concern for other vulnerable litigants.

In hearing this further challenge the Court weighed considerable evidence as to the current operation of the ECF scheme. It found that it is deficient in various respects, including the complexity of the application procedure and the nature of LAA decision-making, and that it is failing to provide the safety net that was promised by Ministers. Mr Justice Collins made it clear that there will need to be significant changes to the operation of the scheme [105].

The Claimant was represented by the Public Law Project (PLP), and Richard Hermer QC, Phillippa Kaufmann QC, Chris Buttler and Ben Silverstone of Matrix Chambers.

Jo Hickman, Director at PLP said:

'PLP has long been concerned about the practical operation of the ECF scheme.This welcome judgment will help to protect the interests of the many children, patients, and other vulnerable adults who would otherwise be unable to achieve justice.'
The full judgment is here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
justice2
Authors
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from