Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

High Court finds Exceptional Funding scheme unlawful

Sep 29, 2018, 22:13 PM
family law, access to justice, LASPO, legal aid, exceptional case funding, public law project, I.S., Gudanaviciene
The High Court has today handed down a judgment in a test case which will have profound implications for access to justice.
Slug : high-court-finds-exceptional-funding-scheme-unlawful
Meta Title : High Court finds Exceptional Funding scheme unlawful
Meta Keywords : family law, access to justice, LASPO, legal aid, exceptional case funding, public law project, I.S., Gudanaviciene
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 15, 2015, 05:09 AM
Article ID : 109847
The High Court has today handed down a judgment in a test case which will have profound implications for access to justice.

In a further judgment in the case of 'I.S.' Mr Justice Collins has found that the Legal Aid Agency’s current operation of the Exceptional Case Funding (ECF) scheme is unlawful.

ECF was established to act as a 'safety net' to mitigate the significant cuts to legal aid otherwise contained in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO). It was meant to protect those whose fundamental rights would be breached in the absence of legal assistance. The scheme is administered by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice.

The case was brought by the Official Solicitor of England and Wales on behalf of a claimant known as 'I.S.' I.S. is blind, has profound cognitive impairments, lacks litigation capacity and is unable to care for himself. I.S., like many others, had been refused ECF.

An earlier judgment had already established that I.S. was properly entitled to ECF and that the restrictive ECF guidance published by the then Lord Chancellor was incorrect and unlawful. The Official Solicitor then pursued a wider public interest claim out of general concern for other vulnerable litigants.

In hearing this further challenge the Court weighed considerable evidence as to the current operation of the ECF scheme. It found that it is deficient in various respects, including the complexity of the application procedure and the nature of LAA decision-making, and that it is failing to provide the safety net that was promised by Ministers. Mr Justice Collins made it clear that there will need to be significant changes to the operation of the scheme [105].

The Claimant was represented by the Public Law Project (PLP), and Richard Hermer QC, Phillippa Kaufmann QC, Chris Buttler and Ben Silverstone of Matrix Chambers.

Jo Hickman, Director at PLP said:

'PLP has long been concerned about the practical operation of the ECF scheme.This welcome judgment will help to protect the interests of the many children, patients, and other vulnerable adults who would otherwise be unable to achieve justice.'
The full judgment is here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
justice2
Authors
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from